Current:Home > StocksSenators urge Biden to end duty-free treatment for packages valued at less than $800-InfoLens
Senators urge Biden to end duty-free treatment for packages valued at less than $800
View Date:2025-01-09 21:39:01
WASHINGTON (AP) — Two U.S. senators looking to crack down on the number of packages from China that enter the country duty-free are calling on President Joe Biden to take executive action, saying U.S. manufacturers can’t compete with low-cost competitors they say rely on forced labor and state subsidies in key sectors.
U.S. trade law allows packages bound for American consumers and valued below a certain threshold to enter tariff-free. That threshold, under a category known as “de minimis,” stands at $800 per person, per day. The majority of the imports are retail products purchased online.
Alarmed by the large increase in such shipments from China, lawmakers in both chambers have filed legislation to alter how the U.S. treats imports valued at less than $800. Now, Sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Rick Scott, R-Fla., have sent a letter to Biden calling on him to end the duty-free treatment altogether for those products.
“The situation has reached a tipping point where vast sections of American manufacturing and retail are at stake if de minimis is not immediately addressed,” the senators wrote.
Brown and Scott singled out Temu, Shein and AliExpress in their letter as companies that “unfairly” benefit from the duty-free treatment of their goods. The surge in shipments, they said, hurts big box stores and other retailers in the U.S.
“This out-of-control problem impacts the safety and livelihoods of Americans, outsourcing not only our manufacturing, but also our retail sectors to China, which — as you know — systematically utilizes slave labor among other unconscionable practices to undermine our economy,” the senators said.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter, which was provided to The Associated Press.
Congress raised the threshold for expedited and duty-fee imports into the U.S. from $200 back in 2016. The argument for doing so is that it speeds up the pace of commerce and lowers costs for consumers. It also allows U.S. Customs and Border Protection to focus its resources on the bigger-ticket items that generate more tariff revenue for the federal government.
The change in duty-free treatment has led to a significant increase in “de minimis” shipments, from about 220 million packages that year to 685 million in fiscal year 2022.
The higher $800 threshold for duty-free treatment has strong backing from many in the business community. John Pickel, a senior director at the National Foreign Trade Council, a trade association that represents a broad range of companies, said that doing as the senators are urging would increase the amount of time it takes for shipments to arrive as they go through a more cumbersome inspection process at the border. And those products would cost more.
“The increase from $200 to $800 has not really been a significant driver in terms of volume,” Pickel said. “What’s really driving interest in the use of de minimis is the desire for consumers to access their products quickly and at a lower transaction cost.”
He said the average shipment that comes into the U.S. through the de minimis category is $55. But that cost would roughly double for the consumer if de minimis treatment no longer applied because importers would have to hire a customs broker and pay additional processing fees and the import duty.
veryGood! (9987)
Related
- Watch a rescuer’s cat-like reflexes pluck a kitten from mid-air after a scary fall
- Senate rival Frank LaRose joins other GOP Ohio officeholders in endorsing Bernie Moreno
- What is Holi, the Hindu festival of colors and how is it celebrated?
- Oklahoma prosecutors will not file charges in fight involving teenager Nex Benedict
- Who will be in the top 12? Our College Football Playoff ranking projection
- Caitlin Clark's first March Madness opponent set: Holy Cross up next after First Four blowout
- Review: ‘Water for Elephants’ on Broadway is a three-ring circus with zero intrigue
- Lawsuit from family of Black man killed by police in Oregon provides additional details of shooting
- Volunteer firefighter accused of setting brush fire on Long Island
- Reddit shares soar on first day of trading as social media platform's IPO arrives
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Red Velvet, Please
- Are there any perfect brackets left in March Madness? Yes ... but not many after Kentucky loss
- Fifth suspect charged in Philadelphia bus stop shooting that wounded 8
- Shohei Ohtani interpreter fiasco is a menacing sign: Sports' gambling problem has arrived
- Police identify 7-year-old child killed in North Carolina weekend shooting
- Oakland extends Kentucky's NCAA Tournament woes with massive March Madness upset
- Lack of buses keeps Los Angeles jail inmates from court appearances and contributes to overcrowding
- Grassley releases whistleblower documents, multi-agency probe into American cartel gunrunning
Recommendation
-
Trump hammered Democrats on transgender issues. Now the party is at odds on a response
-
Land purchases by Chinese ‘agents’ would be limited under Georgia bill; Democrats say it’s racist
-
Chicago police officer wounded, man dead after gunfire exchanged during traffic stop, police say
-
Bird flu is causing thousands of seal deaths. Scientists aren’t sure how to slow it down
-
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign chancellor to step down at end of academic year
-
Review: ‘Water for Elephants’ on Broadway is a three-ring circus with zero intrigue
-
Bird flu is causing thousands of seal deaths. Scientists aren’t sure how to slow it down
-
Hermès Birkin accused of exploiting customers in class-action lawsuit filed in California